SUSHMA DEVI AND ORS. v. SANJEEV VERMA,SECY.SOCIAL WLFARE AND ORS
CPSW/404/2015 · 2026-07-10
Sindhu Sharma
body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 840 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 840 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 404/2015 in SWP No. 1744/2015
Sushma Devi & Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate
Vs
Sanjeev Verma, Secretary, Social Welfare & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Meharbaan Singh, AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 10.07.2026
01. The petitioners seek implementation of the judgment dated 12.06.2015 passed by this Court in SWP No. 1744/2015, titled Sushma Devi & Ors. v. State & Ors., whereby the writ petition was
disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conclude the selection process within a period of six weeks.
02. Statement of facts have been filed by the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 &
5. The respondents submitted that Chairman Selection Committee was asked for completion of the selection process. A meeting was convened in the office of respondent No. 3 in which the Chairman Selection Committee requested the respondent No. 3 to call the then Selection Committee members for checking the record and arrive at conclusion. It is further submitted that, pursuant to the said meeting, the record available in the office of the CDPO was examined and certain discrepancies were noticed. In view of the discrepancies so Sr. No. 35
2
found, it was decided to conduct re-interview of the candidates in terms of the earlier notification so that the selection process could be completed at the earliest. They stated that the disciplinary action has also been recommended against the erring Officer. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that the respondents have taken steps to comply with the judgment of this Court and that there has been no willful or deliberate disobedience of the directions issued therein.
03. In view of the statement of facts placed on record and the
submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court is satisfied that no case of willful disobedience of the
judgment dated 12.06.2015 is made out. Accordingly, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge Jammu 10.07.2026 Amit