Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2015 DAILYLAW 831 (ORI)

BYASADEV BARIK v. UTKAL GRAMEEN BANK

WP(C)/492/2015 · 2026-07-15

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 492 of 2015 Byasadev Barik ..... Petitioner Mr. S.D. Routray, Advocate -versus- Utkal Grameen Bank ..... Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Nanda, Advocate CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 15.07.2026 Order No. 03 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he has received no instruction from his client. However, liberty be granted to file a fresh petition, if any cause of action still subsists. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of no instruction. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha