AJIT KU.SAHU v. INDIRA SUBHADARSANI DEBABANDITA DAS @SAHU
WP(C)/5636/2015 · 2026-03-23
M S Sahoo
Writ Petition (Civil)body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 737 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 737 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5636 of 2015
Ajit Kumar Sahu …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
Indira Subhadarsani Debabandita Das @ Sahu and another …. Opp. Parties
None
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER 23.03.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
05.
1. The matter has been listed under the heading of
“For referral to the Special Mediation Drive 2.0- Mediation for the Nation”.
2. The matter is in the list indicating that the matter shall be finally disposed of.
3. Neither the petitioner nor the opp. parties appear when the matter is called.
4. The writ application was filed in the year 2015, inter alia, seeking direction to the learned Judge, Family Court, Balasore to dispose of the C.P. No.292 of 2014 within a stipulated time.
5. In view of the judgment of the Constitution Bench in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others: (2024) 6 SCC 267, no Constitutional Court should direct fixing of time for disposal of pending petitions. Apparently, the
petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. On perusal of the order dated 18.02.2026, it appears that typographical error has crept into the said order.
The paragraph numbers mentioned in the order dated 18.02.2026 are “1, 2 and 2”.
The 3rd paragraph shall be renumbered as
“paragraph No.3” instead of “paragraph No.2”.
Necessary corrections shall be carried out in the
order sheet in accordance with the rules.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh