Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2015 DAILYLAW 4203 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD YAMIN v. AHSAAN KHAN

A227/6788/2015 · 2026-09-07

Dinesh Pathak

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6788 of 2015 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Instant writ petition has been listed under the heading of "Likely to be Infructuous" cases. 2. However, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to point out the survival of the instant writ petition. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. It is clarified that if the cause of action still survives to maintain the instant writ petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application within limitation against the order of the date. September 8, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gulrez Khan, Javed Husain Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aijaz Ahmad Khan, Anil Kumar Shukla, Himanshi Nausran (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Mohammad Yamin .....Petitioner(s) Ahsaan Khan .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad