ORDER : Petitioner is a Foreign National and seeks interim bail in FIR No. RC AC1/2012/A0012 under Sections 120-B read with Section 380 of IPC and Section 3 of the Official Secret Act, 1923 registered at P.S. CBI/AC-1, New Delhi titled CBI v. Abhishek Verma & Ors. for the period of four weeks to get her Ear Surgery done from a Private Hospital. Trial Court in the impugned order of 14th July, 2015 has noted that the surgery is re-scheduled for 21st July, 2015 at AIIMS Hospital and so, to avoid unnecessary delay, the surgery be performed in the said Hospital while petitioner is in custody. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that petitioner is having various ailments and she has been taken to AIIMS Hospital on few occasions and she had developed infection there and so, she wants to get her surgery done from MAX Hospital in Vasant Kunj or from any other Private Hospital to avoid unnecessary complications due to surgery as her immunity level is quite low. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the interim bail for one week to get the surgery done would be sufficient and petitioner would bear the expenses for the surgery. This petition was opposed by Mr. Narender Mann, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI, by submitting that petitioner is accused of conspiring with her husband-Abhishek Verma for the offence of dissemination of secret defence documents and considering the grave nature of offence, interim bail ought not be granted, as petitioner is being provided best of the treatment. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and the material on record, I find that gravity of the offence dissuades this Court to grant interim bail to petitioner for the surgery. Since petitioner wants to get her surgery done from Private Hospital, therefore, the concerned Jail Superintendent is directed to ensure that petitioner is taken, in custody, at her expense to MAX Hospital, Vasant Kunj, Delhi on 21st July, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. for her medical examination and thereafter, be brought back to the Jail. As and when the date for surgery is fixed, petitioner be taken to the said Hospital, in custody, at her expense and be brought back to jail after she is discharged from Hospital. During the stay in Hospital, petitioner shall remain in custody. As and when the date for surgery is fixed, petitioner be taken to the said Hospital, in custody, at her expense and be brought back to jail after she is discharged from Hospital. During the stay in Hospital, petitioner shall remain in custody. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of. The concerned Jail Superintendent be apprised of this order forthwith.