Repatriates Co-operative Bank v. The Secretary Ministry of
WP/39976/2015 · 2026-07-09
T Vinod Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 3932 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 3932 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 39976 of 2015 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WP No. 39976 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Repatriates Co-operative Bank Share Holders Welfare Association, Old No.15/5D, New No.18, 12th St, Thirunagar, Villivakkam, Chennai-49, Rep. by General Secretary Shri.M.Maheshan .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001. 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001. 3. The Chairman, REPCO Bank (cum) Secretary, Department of Public and Rehabilitation, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St George, Chennai - 600 009. 4. The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 5. Shri. R.Varadarajan ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the official respondents 1 to 4 from relieving the 5th respondent herein who is holding the office of Managing Director of the 3rd respondent bank, without recovering the additional pay and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 39976 of 2015 __________ Page2 of 4 remuneration made to him in his capacity as chairman / Managing Director in the group organisation/subsidiary of the 3rd respondent bank. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1,R2 & R4 : No Appearance For R3 : Mr.A.Ilangovan For R5 : Mr.K.Raghupathy ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 08.07.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal. 2. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even when the matter is called at the end of the list, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even after the matter was listed under the caption for dismissal, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition . https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 39976 of 2015 __________ Page3 of 4
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09-07-2026 KKD To
1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001
2.
The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001. 3. The Chairman, REPCO Bank (cum) Secretary, Department of Public and Rehabilitation, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St George, Chennai - 600 009. 4. The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 39976 of 2015 __________ Page4 of 4 T.VINOD KUMAR J. KKD WP No. 39976 of 2015 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis