DEBTS AND SECURITIES OF v. A.VETRI SELVAN (Deceased) and 10 Others
OP/718/2015 · 2026-06-11
A D Maria Clete
Transfer Petitionbody2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 3913 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 3913 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OP No. 718 of 2015 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE OP No. 718 of 2015 A.Parthiban S/o.A.Arumugam ..Petitioner Vs
1. A.Vetri Selvan (Deceased) S/o.A.Arumugam
2. A.Manimaran (Deceased) S/o.A.Arumugam
3. R.Barathi D/o.A.Arumugam
4. Kodiarasi W/o.Vetri Selvan
5. Manoj Kumar S/o.Vetri Selvan
6. Nirmal Kumar S/o.Vetri Selvan (Respondents 4, 5 and 6 amended as per order in A.No.3033/2024, dated 05.08.2024)
7. Tamil Selvi W/o.Manimaran,
8. Rajesh S/o.Manimaran, (Respondents 7 and 8 amended as per order in A.No.3035/2024 dated 05.08.2024) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OP No. 718 of 2015 __________ Page2 of 4
9. Moses S/o.James 10.Minor Jenisha D/o.Moses 11.Minor Mohit S/o.Moses (Minors 10 and 11 are Represented by their father and natural guardian the 9th Respondent herein) (Respondents 9 to 11 amended as per order in A.Nos.3037 and 3038/2024 dated 05.08.2024) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 r/w. Order XXV, Rule 6 of the Original Side Rules, praying that Succession Certificate may be granted to the petitioner with power to collect in the debts and to receive interest specified in the schedule ‘B’ hereunder which is his 1/4th share. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s.R.Manimuthu For R3 M/s.V.Subbarayan For R1 M/s.Annamalai For R2 ORDER When the matter was listed for hearing on 24.04.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 03.06.2026. Since the matter was not listed on 03.06.2026, Registry was directed to list the matter today i.e., 11.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OP No. 718 of 2015 __________ Page3 of 4 When the matter was called today there was no representation for the petitioner and hence it is clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Original Petition.
2. Hence, this Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OP No. 718 of 2015 __________ Page4 of 4 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. SRM OP No. 718 of 2015 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis