JUDGMENT : S.P.Garg, J. (Oral) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner – Charu Rohtagi to challenge the legality and propriety of an order dated 06.04.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. No. 103/14 by which order dated 03.06.2014 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate was upheld. The petitioner was directed to undergo sentence Till rising of the Court (TRC) with fine of Rs.7,50,000/-, Rs.7,25,000/-were payable to the complainant. The revision petition is contested by the respondent No.1 / complainant. 2. During the course of arguments, the parties settled the dispute. Certain amount has been deposited by the petitioner in RFA No.342/2013. The amount deposited in the said RFA has been ordered to be released to the complainant pursuant to the settlement. Leaned counsel for the respondent No.1 / complainant states that he has no objection if the revision petition stands disposed of as settled / compounded. 3. Since the matter has been settled amicably between the parties, revision petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as settled / compounded. The petitioner is acquitted. The complainant / respondent No.1 will be entitled to the release of the amount deposited by the petitioner in RFA No.342/2013. 4. Since the matter has been settled at revisional stage, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.40,000/-as costs within two weeks before the Trial Court. 5. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of. 6. Trial Court record (if any) along with copy of the order be sent back immediately.