SIDDHARTH S/O SANTOSH PARATE v. THE COMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATES, THR. ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
CAW/2015/2026 · 2026-08-18
body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 2932 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 2932 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 33.caw.2015.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2015 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4866 OF 2026
Siddharth s/o Santosh Parate Vs. The Committee for Verification of Scheduled Tribe Certificates, Yavatmal, District Yavatmal through its Member Secretary
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vishwa Gadbaile, Advocate for applicant/ petitioner. Ms. H. N. Jaipurkar, AGP for respondent.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 18/08/2026
1. Leave is granted to the applicant to correct the title clause.
2. By this application, the applicant is seeking the amendment to add the respondent No.2 “The State Common Entrance Test Cell, Maharashtra State, 8th Floor, New Excelsior Building, A. K. Nayak Marg, Fort Mumbai – 1 through its Commissioner / Chairman” and respondent No.3 “Sir J. J. Institute of Applied Arts, Mumbai, through its Registrar, D. N. Road, Fort Mumbai – 400001”, as a necessary party and also amendment in a prayer clauses.
3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, who submitted that the petitioner has challenged the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the tribe claim as a ‘Halbi’. On 24.06.2026, the notice was already issued to the respondent. 2026:BHC-NAG:10859-DB
(2) 33.caw.2015.2026 He further submitted that the petitioner is admitted to the course on the seat reserved for the Scheduled Tribe, but due to the invalidation, there is a likelihood of cancellation of his admission and, therefore, he wants to amend the petition by adding “The State Common Entrance Test Cell” and “Sir J. J. Institute of Applied Arts, Mumbai” as a party as well as a prayer clauses.
4. Learned AGP has no objection for the same.
5. In view of that, the amendment application is allowed.
6. The petitioner to carry out the amendment within one week. On carrying out the amendment, the notices be issued to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 i.e. newly added respondents.
7. The civil application is disposed of.
(RAJ D. WAKODE, J) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J) Sarkate Signed by: Mr. A.R. Sarkate Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 19:04:12