Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2015 DAILYLAW 2891 (BOM)

MUNDEWADI GAJALA AJAJ AHMED v. THE DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE AND ORS.

WP/9357/2015 · 2026-08-24

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20-9357-15-wp.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9357 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 787 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9357 OF 2015 Mundewadi Gajala Ajaj Ahmed ....Petitioner Vs. The Divisional Caste Certificate & Ors. ....Respondents Mr. Shivaji Kokare i/b Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ravi P. Kadam, ‘B’ Panel counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 24 AUGUST 2026 P. C. : 1. Mr. Shivaji Kokare, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that his client is not responding to the calls made by his office; therefore, he has no instructions to argue the present Writ Petition. 2. By the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner challenges the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee on 29 June 2015. 3. Since there are no instructions from the Petitioner to her Advocate to conduct the present Writ Petition, it seems that she has 1 of 2 Iresh IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2026.08.24 18:56:05 +0530 20-9357-15-wp.doc lost interest in pursuing the Writ Petition any further. 4. The Petitioner had claimed belonging to the OBC category from the caste "Julaha", which is in the OBC-57 notified category and had taken the benefit of the same for seeking admission in Respondent No. 2 – College for the B. Pharmacy course, which is a four-year course. 5. The Vigilance Cell/Committee had conducted an inquiry/survey on 29 June 2015, whereby her claim was rejected as the entry of "Julaha" in the certificate was after the due date and did not find place in the school record of the father of the Petitioner. 6. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. In sequel, the pending Civil/Interim Applications also stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] 2 of 2