Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2015 DAILYLAW 2823 (BOM)

MR. ARIF DADA MEMON v. SMT. TAHARIM MOHSIN PATEL AND ORS

WP/11291/2015 · 2026-02-27

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24-WP-11291-2015.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11291 OF 2015 Mr. Arif Dada Memon … Petitioners Vs. Smt. Taharim Mohsin Patel … Respondents and Others None for the Petitioners. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 27th FEBRUARY 2026 ORDER : 1. On 16th January 2026 the following order was passed : “1. None appears for the petitioner. Office remark shows learned Advocate for the petitioner has not supplied copies, hence notice is not issued. 2. By way of last chance, two weeks time is granted to supply copies, failing which the petition will stand dismissed without further reference to court. 3. If copies are supplied, office is directed to issue notice as per order dated 24th December 2025. Notice is made returnable on 27th February 2026. 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2026.03.04 10:45:34 +0530 24-WP-11291-2015.docx 4. Learned Advocate for the applicant shall ensure that copies are supplied and court notice is served by taking hamdast.” 2. Office remark shows that the learned Advocate for the petitioner has not taken any steps. Even today, none appears for the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2