11-sa-649-2015.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 649 OF 2015 Dadasaheb Nathu Pagar … Appellant vs. Madhukar Nathu Pagar and Ors … Respondents None for the Appellant. Ms. Chaitali Bhogle i/b. Mr. Sagar Kasar for the Respondents. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 10th JULY 2026 ORDER: 1. Office remark shows that the notice issued to the sole appellant is returned with the bailiff remark ‘insufficient address’. The matter was adjourned to enable the appellant to take steps and appear in the appeal. However, none appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute. 2. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, the second appeal is disposed of on the ground that nothing survives in the second appeal. (GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 1 of 1 varsha VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Digitally signed by VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Date: 2026.07.14 14:02:42 +0530