MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. DAGDU PANDU SHINDE AND OTHERS
CA/11837/2017 · 2026-07-27
Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 2762 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 2762 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
742.2015CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 742 OF 2015 IN WP/10066/2014 DAGDU PANDU SHINDE AND OTHERS VERSUS MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 27.07.2026 P.C. : 1] None for the petitioners. 2] Though the learned A.G.P. had earlier submitted that the petitioners are not coming for accepting the compensation, but later on he placed on record receipts of the petitioners whereby they have accepted the amount of compensation. Those receipts are taken on record and identified as “X” Collectively. 3] Since, the petitioners have received the amount of compensation, nothing survives in this petition and it stands
disposed of along with pending civil application, if any.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:31086-DB