CRM-M-9836 of 2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9836 of 2015 Date of Decision: 26.03.2018 Asmina ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikas Garg Narwana, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU , J.(Oral) It has been pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that as a matter of fact the entire prosecution evidence is over in this case and the matter is fixed for arguments. On the last date of hearing none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present case. Dismissed for non prosecution. [MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU] JUDGE March 26, 2018 rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned yes/no Whether reportable? yes/no Rashmi 2018.03.27 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document