Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2015 DAILYLAW 2562 (PNJ)

AMRIK SINGH BHATTI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/3548/2017 · 2026-07-06

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

209 AMRIK SINGH BHATTI UNION OF OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. 18.09.2015 (Annexure P learned Central (for short “ No. 060/00083/2015 in OA No. 813/PB/2010 2. the salary of the petitioner, any excess amount already paid, no recovery will be done in any manner. Hence, keeping in view the above, the orders dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3548 Date of Decision : AMRIK SINGH BHATTI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Senior Standing (joined through V.C.) with Mr. T.S Sullar, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent-Union of India. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the orders dated 18.09.2015 (Annexure P-9) and 15.12.2015 (Annexure P Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short “ the Tribunal”) in OA No. 813/PB/2010 and Review Application No. 060/00083/2015 in OA No. 813/PB/2010 Learned counsel for the parties agree that upon re the salary of the petitioner, any excess amount already paid, no recovery will be done in any manner. Hence, keeping in view the above, the orders dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3548-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.07.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Prateek Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Verma, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Senior Standing Counsel Mr. T.S Sullar, Junior Standing Counsel Union of India. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the orders dated 15.12.2015 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in OA No. 813/PB/2010 and Review Application No. 060/00083/2015 in OA No. 813/PB/2010. arties agree that upon re-fixation of the salary of the petitioner, any excess amount already paid, no recovery will be done in any manner. Hence, keeping in view the above, the orders dated INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the orders dated 10) passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in OA No. 813/PB/2010 and Review Application fixation of the salary of the petitioner, any excess amount already paid, no recovery will be done in any manner. Hence, keeping in view the above, the orders dated SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.08 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3548-2017 (O&M) -2- 18.09.2015 (Annexure P-9) and 15.12.2015 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Tribunal and Review Application No. 060/00083/2015, is upheld with only modification that upon re-fixation of the salary of the petitioner, any excess amount already paid, no recovery will be done. 3. Present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 06-07-2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.08 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document