Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2015 DAILYLAW 2486 (PNJ)

SURJIT KAUR v. BALDEV SINGH AND ORS

RSA/1842/2015 · 2026-02-12

Nidhi Gupta

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-1842- IN THE HIG 220 Surjit Kaur Baldev Sing CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment of District Jud respondent N dated 07.06 declaration f No. 2 to 4 he 2. instructions deceased), w compromise disposed of -2015 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Kaur Versus v Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Sh. Manjit Singh son of decease is present in person with Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate for r GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiff No. 1 is in ent of reversal dated 27.11.2012 pass t Judge, Kapurthala whereby the dent No. 1 was allowed, setting as 07.06.2012 passed by the learned ation filed by plaintiff No. 1 along with to 4 herein was dismissed. At the very outset, learned c tions from Manjit Singh son of sole , who is present in person sub omised between the parties and the p ed of, accordingly. Learned counsel f ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1842-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA eceased appellant-Surjit Kaur vocate. te for respondent No. 1. 1 is in second appeal against the 2 passed by the learned Additional the appeal filed by defendant/ ng aside the judgment and decree learned trial Court; and suit for ng with his co-plaintiffs/respondents rned counsel for the appellant on f sole appellant-Surjit Kaur (since n submits that the matter stands the present second appeal may be unsel for the appellant has also filed the onal cree for ents t on ince ands y be filed RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.13 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1842- affidavit dat appellant-Su the parties, aforesaid bea 3. aforesaid sub 4. disposed of, 5. 12.02.2026 rishu -2015 (O&M) -2- vit dated 12.02.2026 duly sworn-in b Surjit Kaur, stating therein the fac arties, along with photocopy of Aa aid bearing No. 500769877171. The s Learned counsel for responden aid submissions of learned counsel for In view of the above, the p ed of, accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable in by Manjit Singh son of sole the factum of compromise between of Aadhar Card of Manjit Singh The same are taken on record. ondent No. 1 has not disputed the sel for the appellant. the present second appeal stands any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No sole een ingh the ands RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.13 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.