RSA-5692- IN THE HIG 227 Harbans Kau Balbir Chand CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby the Agreement t 2. the main ap 29.01.2015. which on 03 was adjourne last date of appellants passed by th -2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA

RSA Date o ns Kaur and others Versus Chand M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant-appellants are i rrent judgments and decrees rendered by the suit for possession by way ment to Sell dated 04.01.2007 was dec The matter pertains to the year ain appeal was issued by the Predece 2015. Thereafter, the matter was liste on 03 dates i.e. 07.12.2015, 11.12.20 journed at the request of learned coun te of hearing i.e. 14.07.2023 again l had sought time argue the mat by the Predecessor Bench of this Cou “The counsel for the res deed on basis of the impugne already executed and registere decree-holder with the interv execution proceedings, but th ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5692-2014 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA vocate for the respondent. s are in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts way of specific performance of as decreed. e year 2014 and notice of motion in redecessor Bench vide order dated s listed for hearing 04 times, out of .12.2017 and 05.03.2019, the same d counsel for the appellants. On the gain learned proxy counsel for the e matter and following order was is Court:- respondent submits that the sale ugned judgments and decrees is stered in favour of the respondent tervention of the Court during t the possession of the land in the e of n in t of ame the the le is nt ng in RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-5692- 2. appellants, d 3. sale deed on stands exec nothing surv 4. 5. Predecessor present seco 6. 18.03.2026 rishu -2014 (O&M) -2- question is still with the app appellants are interested in de present appeal. The counsel for the appe to argue the matter. Copy of LCR has been 20.11.2023. for arguments. To be taken up immediat Today, none has put in ap ants, despite the case having been calle Learned counsel for the respo eed on the basis of the impugned ju executed in favour of the respon g survives in the present second appea Heard. In view of the above and th essor Bench in the order dated 14.07 t second appeal stands dismissed, acco Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable appellants and that is why, the n delaying the proceedings in the appellants prays for adjournment been received. Now be listed on ediately after the urgent list.” in appearance on behalf of the n called twice. respondent has reiterated that the ned judgments and decrees already respondent/Decree-Holder, as such appeal. nd the observations made by the 14.07.2023 reproduced above, the accordingly. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No he he nt on the the ady such the the RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.