CWP-8143- IN TH 214 Ganpat and o State of Hary CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. of the Consti or order in th not regulariz 20.05.2015 (A titled as Chh Further prayi the responde with the resp dated 02.06.2 1 -2023 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA Date of De t and others VERSUS f Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchand Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Har Mr. Prateek Mahajan with Mr. K respondents No.2 to 9. **** REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has be Constitution of India with a prayer for in the nature of certiorari for quashi gularizing the services of petitioner 015 (Annexure P-8) passed in CWP Chhabi Lal and others Versus S r praying for issuance of a writ in the pondents to regularize the services o e respondents for the last more than 13 02.06.2003 and 29.07.2011 (Annexur NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-8143-2023 (O&M) of Decision: January 08, 2026 .....Petitioner SUS ...Responden E HARPREET SINGH BRAR nchanda, Advocate for the petitioners , Haryana. Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocates for has been filed under Article 226/227 er for issuance of an appropriate writ quashing the action of respondents for itioners in spite of judgment dated WP-2326-2011 of this Court in case us State of Haryana and others in the nature of mandamus directing ices of petitioners who are working than 13 to 34 years in view of policies nnexure P-5 and P-6) issued by the ioners ondents s. 6/227 writ nts for dated n case ers. ecting rking licies y the PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.09 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8143- respondent- this Court for 2. extent that th and the same order after af 3. claim of the accordance w 4. for the peti respondents representation order, after a months from decision take 5. sought, the sa 6. of accordingl January 08 P.C 2 -2023 -Department as well as in view o urt for regularizing the services of par Learned counsel for the petition that the present petition be treated as same be decided in a time bound fter affording an opportunity of being Learned counsel for responden f the petitioners would be considered ance with law by respondent(s)/compe Therefore, in view of the submi e petitioners, the present writ peti s/competent authority is directed ntation and consider the claim of the after affording them an opportunity to s from the date of receiving a certified n taken thereof shall be conveyed to th Needless to say, if the petitioner , the same shall be granted forthwith by Pending miscellaneous applicati rdingly. ry 08, 2026 Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable. : iew of various judgments passed by of part time employees. etitioners has limited his prayer to the ted as a comprehensive representation ound manner by passing a speaking being heard. ondents No.2 to 9 submits that the idered by passing a speaking order in competent authority. submission made by learned counsel etition is disposed of and the irected to treat the writ petition as of the petitioners and pass a speaking nity to be heard, within a period of 03 rtified copy of this order. Further, the d to the petitioners. itioners are found entitled to the relief with by the respondents. plication(s), if any, be also disposed (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE easoned. : Yes/No Yes/No ed by to the tation aking at the der in unsel d the on as aking 03 er, the relief posed RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.09 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document