Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2015 DAILYLAW 2385 (PNJ)

VINOD KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

CWP/17085/2015 · 2026-05-01

Sanjiv Berry

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17085-2015 201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Vinod Kumar and others State of Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. 2. on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Superior Judicial Service Rules, 2007 4. attained finality in a bunch of petitions, including ‘Rajender and others Vs. State of Haryana and 21.03.2024. The said d 24.09.2019 in The Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vinod Kumar and others Versus State of Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) No one appears on behalf of the petitioners, even on second call. On the last occasion also, i.e. on 21.04.2026, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Challenge in the present petition is to Rule 11 (bb) of the Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules, 2007. The said challenge has already been adjudicated upon and attained finality in a bunch of petitions, including Rajender and others Vs. State of Haryana and 21.03.2024. The said decision was based upon an ear 24.09.2019 in CWP-21026-2019 titled ‘Dr. Gurpuneet Singh Randhawa Vs. The Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17085-2015 Date of decision : 01.05.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ( Oral ) behalf of the petitioners, even on second call. On the last occasion also, i.e. on 21.04.2026, none had appeared Challenge in the present petition is to Rule 11 (bb) of the Haryana The said challenge has already been adjudicated upon and attained finality in a bunch of petitions, including CWP-27851-2023 titled Rajender and others Vs. State of Haryana and another’, decided ecision was based upon an earlier decision rendered on Dr. Gurpuneet Singh Randhawa Vs. The Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh 2015 .2026 …….Petitioners ...….Respondents behalf of the petitioners, even on second call. On the last occasion also, i.e. on 21.04.2026, none had appeared Challenge in the present petition is to Rule 11 (bb) of the Haryana The said challenge has already been adjudicated upon and titled decided on lier decision rendered on Dr. Gurpuneet Singh Randhawa Vs. ’. NAROTAM DASS 2026.05.04 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17085-2015 4.1 Randhawa’s case of any challenge to the same. 5. titled ‘Kanu Sharma Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh and others’ 6. petition and the same stands dismissed in light of the aforesaid decisions. May 01, 2026 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2015 Both the aforesaid decisions in Randhawa’s case and Rajender’s case have attained finality due to absence of any challenge to the same. This Court, on earlier occasion, had dismissed Kanu Sharma Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh and others’ on 25.07.2025 for the same reasons. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this petition and the same stands dismissed in light of the aforesaid decisions. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Both the aforesaid decisions in Dr. Gupuneet Singh have attained finality due to absence This Court, on earlier occasion, had dismissed CWP-21095-2025 Kanu Sharma Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana at on 25.07.2025 for the same reasons. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this petition and the same stands dismissed in light of the aforesaid decisions. ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( SANJIV BERRY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Dr. Gupuneet Singh have attained finality due to absence 2025 Kanu Sharma Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana at In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this NAROTAM DASS 2026.05.04 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment