IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 108 of 2015 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026. Mohammad Ali Sadiqui ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus Mahindra & Mahindra ...Non-applicant/Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Applicant/Petitioner : Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the Non-Applicant/Respondent : Mr. Rahul, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the applicant/convict has produced the receipt dated 08.07.2026, issued by Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹9,369/- being the 7.5% of the cheque amount of ₹1,24,918/-, which is taken on record. 2. The record shows that the petitioner/accused was convicted and sentenced by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Shimla, H.P. on 16.08.2011, in Criminal Case No. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 364-3 of 2005, titled Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited Vs. Mohamad Ali Sadiqui, as affirmed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla in Criminal Appeal RBT No. 107-S/1 of 13/11, titled Mohamad Ali Sadiqui Vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited. 3. It has been stated that an amount of ₹67,000/- has been deposited in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Shimla which is to be disbursed to the petitioner/accused as per the compromise between the parties. Hence, an amount of ₹67,000/- is ordered to be released in favour of the petitioner/accused by remitting it to his bank account, on furnishing of bank details, if not furnished earlier. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 8th July, 2026 (Nikita)