IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA C WP No. 2325 of 2015 Decided on: 06.03.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Rohit Chaudhary ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. ……Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Abhilasha Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pawan Nadda, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) Ms. Abhilasha Kaundal, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, submits that the instant petition has become infructuous with the passage of time and the same may be closed [Statement taken on record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the Learned Additional Advocate General for the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? respondents. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is closed, along with all pending application(s), if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 06th March, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez) 2