IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision Nos. 224 & 32 of 2015 Date of Decision : 9.1.2026 1. Cr. Revision No. 224 of 2015 Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent 2. Cr. Revision No. 32 of 2015 Vikram Kumar alias Vicky ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner(s), in both the petitions. : Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate. For the respondents/State, in both the petitions : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) As per report received from Assistant Superintendent of Jail, Chamba, both the accused have undergone the sentence awarded to them. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Since, the petitioner(s)/accused have expressed their intention not to proceed further with the present petitions, therefore, the present revisions are dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 9th January, 2026 (Chander)