Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2015 DAILYLAW 1593 (GAU)

KAMINI BARMAN v. STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS,

WP(C)/2848/2015 · 2026-07-28

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010013642015 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2848/2015 KAMINI BARMAN S/O LT. MAHENDRA NATH BARMAN, R/O JOWARDDI, P.S. BELSOR, DIST- NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS, REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER / SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ULUBARI ASSAM GHY-7 3:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ADMN. ULUBARI GHY-7 ASSAM 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NALBARI DIST- NALBARI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MSK KALITA, MS.A CHAKRABORTY,MR.B K BHAGAWATI Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM(R1-4), Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 29.07.2026 Heard Mr. B. K. Bhagawati, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents. Mr. B. K. Bhagawati, learned counsel, submits that the suspension order impugned in the present writ petition has already been revoked and the petitioner has been treated as being on duty. He further submits that since the petitioner has got the reliefs sought, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ proceedings. He also furnishes a letter dated 17.11.2023 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Nalbari. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. The letter dated 17.11.2023 is kept on record and marked as “X”. JUDGE Comparing Assistant