DIPNARAYAN BORAH v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA and 6 ORS
WP(C)/1647/2015 · 2026-03-16
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 1566 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 1566 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210602015
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1647/2015 DIPNARAYAN BORAH C/O LT. DEBENDRA NATH BORAH R/O VILL- ULUANI GAON, P.O. RUPAHI P.S. RUPAHI HAT, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM PIN - 782125. VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA and 6 ORS REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL OFFICE, CHAIRMAN'S SECRETARIAT, PN.B. NO.1 2, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400021.
2:THE DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR and CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DMD and CDO STATE BANK BHAWAN CENTRAL OFFICE 8TH FLOOR MADAME CAME MARG MUMBAI- 400021.
3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA LOCAL HEAD OFFICE NORTH EASTERN CIRCLE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI P.O. ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
4:THE GENERAL MANAGER APPOINTING AUTHORITY STATE BANK OF INDIA NETWORK-I
Page No.# 2/3 LOCAL HEAD OFFICE NORTH EASTERN CIRCLE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI P.O. ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
5:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE REGION-III MARWARIPATTY NAGAON ASSAM PIN NO. 782001.
6:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA DHING BRANCH DHING NAGAON ASSAM PIN - 782123.
7:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA LANKA BRANCH LANKA NAGAON ASSAM PIN - 782446 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.G GOSWAMI, MRK K DAS,MR.M PHUKAN,MR. P DUTTA,MRT K BHATTACHARYYA,MR.P J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.K K DEYR-1 to 7, MRV K BAROOAH(R-1 to 7),MR.A SHARAN,MR.B J MUKHERJEE,MR.S S SHARMA,MS.L SHARMA
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 17.03.2026
None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. K. K. Dey, learned Standing Counsel, State Bank of India, appears for all the respondents. On the last date of listing i.e. on 10.02.2026, it is found that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above position, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant