Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2015 DAILYLAW 1390 (KAR)

THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC v. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SURESH BHOSLE

WP/102957/2015 · 2026-07-14

Addl Registrar Judicial

body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WP NO 102957 OF 2015 [L-KSRTC] BETWEEN THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC CHIKKODI DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, CHIKKODI THE PETTIIOENR IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE HUBBALLI ... PETITIONER (By Sri./Smt : SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE) AND CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SURESH BHOSLE AGE:34 YEARS, OCC. NIL R/O BALAJI PARK, NEAR RR PATIL GARAGE, UJALAVADI TQ. KARAVEER, DIST. KHOLAPUR (MAHARASHTRA) ... RESPONDENT 2 This WP is filed under article 226 & 227 of constitution of India, 1950 praying to quash the award dated: 27.01.2012, passed by the Additional Labour Court, Hubballi in kid. no. 159/2011, the copy of the same is produced and marked as annexure-B to the writ petition and consequently be pleased to dismiss the kid. no. 159/2011 filed by the respondent on the file of Additional Labour Court, Hubballi and etc... This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court, made the following. O R D E R “Six weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed automatically, without further reference to the Court.” Sd/- JUDGE Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.02.2016 the Advocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 102957/2015 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated: 30/11/2015. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By :- afh R- By:- C- By:-