THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC v. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SURESH BHOSLE
WP/102957/2015 · 2026-07-14
Addl Registrar Judicial
body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 1390 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 1390 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WP NO 102957 OF 2015 [L-KSRTC]
BETWEEN
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC CHIKKODI DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, CHIKKODI THE PETTIIOENR IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE HUBBALLI
... PETITIONER
(By Sri./Smt : SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SURESH BHOSLE AGE:34 YEARS, OCC. NIL R/O BALAJI PARK, NEAR RR PATIL GARAGE, UJALAVADI TQ. KARAVEER, DIST. KHOLAPUR (MAHARASHTRA)
... RESPONDENT
2 This WP is filed under article 226 & 227 of constitution of India, 1950 praying to quash the award dated: 27.01.2012, passed by the Additional Labour Court, Hubballi in kid. no. 159/2011, the copy of the same is produced and marked as annexure-B to the writ petition and consequently be pleased to dismiss the kid. no. 159/2011 filed by the respondent on the file of Additional Labour Court, Hubballi and etc...
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court, made the following.
O R D E R
“Six weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed automatically, without further reference to the Court.” Sd/- JUDGE
Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.02.2016 the Advocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 102957/2015 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated: 30/11/2015.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By :- afh R- By:-
C- By:-