1 APHC010448902015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 200/2015 Between: 1. MULUGURU NAREN, VJA, KRISHNA DIST, S/O. LATE YERRI SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O. D.NO.67-8-10, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. ...APPELLANT AND 1. NADELLA ANIL KUMAR VJA KRISHNA DIST 2 OTHERS, S/O. VENKATA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HINDU, PROPERTIES, D.NO.48-5/2-2A, TIKKIL ROAD, SHYAM NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 2. NADELLA MAHIJA, W/O. ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, PROPERTIES, D.NO.48-5/2-2A, TIKKIL ROAD, SHYAM NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 3. VALLABHANENI SATISH, S/O. LATE RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HINDU, PROPERTIES, D.NO.32-41- 47/2, REVENUE COLONY, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersAggrieved by the order of the X1 Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada, passed in IA.No.853/2014 in OS.No.73/2014, dt.6.3.2015, the petitioner begs to prefer the above appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 407 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the plaint schedule property in OS.No.73/2014 on the file of the XI Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Krishna at Gudivada, pending disposal of the appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU 2. C V R RUDRA PRASAD 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 200/2015 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order dated 06.03.2015 passed by the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna at Gudivada in I.A. No.853 of 2014 in O.S. No.73 of 2014. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the main suit itself has already been decreed and, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present appeal. 3. Since the present appeal arises out of an interlocutory order passed in I.A. No.853 of 2014 and the main suit itself has subsequently been decreed, the cause for pursuing the present appeal no longer survives. Consequently, the appeal has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH _________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 23.06.2026 klk 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 53 C.M.A.No.200 of 2015 Dated: 23.06.2026 klk