Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 3947of 2014
Suprava Jena …. Petitioner
M/s. S. K. Nayak-2. Advocate & Associates
Versus-
The Additional Commissioner, Consolidation & Settlement, Balasore & others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA M/s.P.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate & Associates For O.P. No.4
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 12.11.2024
06. 1. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
2.
Learned counsel for opposite party No.4 is, however, present.
3. Considering the fact that the matter is a year-old one, the Court is not inclined to adjourn hearing of the same,
4. Consequently, in absence of anyone appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Balaram
Judge Designation: Personal Assistant