Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2014 DAILYLAW 934 (ORI)

SUPRAVA JENA v. ADDL.COMMNR.SETTLEM

WP(C)/3947/2014 · 2026-05-01

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 3947of 2014 Suprava Jena …. Petitioner M/s. S. K. Nayak-2. Advocate & Associates Versus- The Additional Commissioner, Consolidation & Settlement, Balasore & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA M/s.P.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate & Associates For O.P. No.4 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 12.11.2024 06. 1. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. 2. Learned counsel for opposite party No.4 is, however, present. 3. Considering the fact that the matter is a year-old one, the Court is not inclined to adjourn hearing of the same, 4. Consequently, in absence of anyone appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (R.K. Pattanaik) Balaram Judge Designation: Personal Assistant