REETA DEVI v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2380/2014 · 2026-09-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 648 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 648 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2380/2014 c/w CPSW No. 736/2017
Reeta Devi …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.09.2026
SWP No. 2380/2014
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
CPSW No. 736/2017
Since the main matter has been dismissed, the contempt petition arising out of the order/judgment passed by this Court in the instant matter does not survive. Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are also closed. Rule if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
Sr. No. 52