RUBEENA KOUSER v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2404/2014 · 2026-09-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 646 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 646 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2404/2014
Rubeena Kouser …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.09.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last two consecutive dates of hearing and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
Sr. No. 53