CPSW No. 271/2014 Page 1 of 2 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 271/2014 in SWP No. 1537/2002 IA No. 1/2017 Bari Ram ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. R.K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Uday Bhaskar, Advocate V/s R.K. Mathur and another ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 24.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have already complied with the judgment passed by the learned writ court and learned counsel for the petitioner, in light of the aforesaid statement, sought time vide order dated 25.03.2026 to have instructions in the matter and report the same to this Court. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up, it has been brought to the notice of the Court by Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Senior counsel that the PPO, which has been sent by the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (PCDA), Allahabad to the concerned Bank was not legible and this was the precise reason that the pension arising out the judgment could not be released in favour of the petitioner. 3. Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI appearing on behalf of the respondents assures the Court that the legible documents shall be sent forthwith Sr. No. 28 CPSW No. 271/2014 Page 2 of 2 to the Bank so that the order/judgment is practically complied with and the petitioner is able to get the fruits of the same. Accordingly, he assures the Court that the needful shall be done within one week from today and the payment thereafter shall be released in favour of the petitioner within one week. 4. In light of the statement so made and assurance extended by learned counsel for the respondents, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping this contempt petition alive. Accordingly, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule if any shall stand discharged. However, it is made clear that, in case, if the needful is not done as directed by this Court within the aforesaid period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the instant petition and in that eventuality, the Court will be constraint to take coercive measures against the respondents. 5. Disposed of as above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 24.07.2026 Pawan Angotra Pawan Angotra 2026.07.24 18.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document