Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2014 DAILYLAW 616 (UTT)

Satyanarayan v. Smt Asha Kalra

FA/50/2014 · 2026-05-21

Siddhartha Sah

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS FA No.50 of 2014 With FA No.28 of 2015 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Sunil Chandra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. D.S. Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the respondents. The Withdrawal Applications (IA Nos.11315/2026 & 14351/2026) have been filed on behalf of the appellant on the premise that during the pendency of the appeal, Smt. Vimla Kalra has already executed a sale deed dated 05.05.2021 of the property in question in Suit No.139 of 2010, Satyanarayan vs. Smt. Vimla Kalra and others, in favour of the wife of the appellant which was duly registered on 05.05.2021 and the parties relations have become cordial, therefore, the appellant has decided to withdraw both the appeals. The said applications are not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In such view of the matter, the Withdrawal Applications (IA Nos.11315/2026 & 14351/2026) are allowed and both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 21.05.2026 Ravi