Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA1 NO. 1 4 9 8 / 2 0 2 5
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Prem Prakash Bhatt, Legal Aid Counsel, for the applicant.
Mr. R.K. Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State. (2) Applicant is facing trial for the offences punishable under Section 302, 34 and 120B IPC. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that there is no eyewitness to the alleged incident; who fired at the deceased is not known and the applicant is under incarceration since 19.3.2014. (3) Learned State Counsel, however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that widow of the deceased identified the applicant in the dock during trial; firearm was recovered on the pointing out of the applicant; applicant is also wanted in connection with an FIR registered under Section 302 IPC in PS Muzzafnagar, U.P. and as many as 8 FIRs are registered against the applicant in the State of Uttarakhand, details whereof are as under: Sr. No. PS Case Crime No. Section 1 Clement Town 101/ 2004 379/ 411 I PC 2 Vikasnagar 146/ 2004 379/ 411 I PC 133/ 2004 356 I PC 3 Rishikesh 39/ 2008 302/ 120B I PC 61/ 2008 302/ 34 I PC, 25 Arms Act 4 Patel Nagar 37/ 2014 302/ 120B/ 34 I PC 63/ 2014 302/ 34 I PC 99/ 2014 2/ 3 Gangsters Act
(4) Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the crim inal antecedents of the applicant, and without commenting on the final merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Bail application is, accordingly, rejected. (5) However, considering that out of 40, only 15 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far, as informed by learned State Counsel, Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
7 .5 .2 0 2 6 Pr