RAMESH KUMAR PANDITA v. TSERING MAROOP,SECY.LADAKH AFARS AND ORS
CPSW/482/2014 · 2026-02-06
Sanjay Dhar
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 564 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 564 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 482/2014 In SWP No. 740/2007
Ramesh Kumar Pandita …..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Tsering Maroop & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (06.02.2026)
01. None for the petitioner. On the last date of hearing also, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present contempt petition, as such, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application/s, if any.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
06.02.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 23 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.02.06 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document