KRISHAN JI BHAN v. STATE TH.AGRICULTURE DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/192/2014 · 2026-03-30
Sanjay Dhar
Contempt Petitionbody2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 557 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 557 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 586/2014 c/w SWP No. 192/2014
Kisahan Ji Bhan
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Ashok Kumar Parmar, Secy. Agricultural & Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 30.03.2026
SWP No. 192/2014
01. Nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and same is the position today. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
02. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
CPSW No. 586/2014
04. This contempt petition arises out of the interim order dated 30.01.2014 passed in SWP No. 192/2014. Since the main writ petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution, the interim order dated 30.01.2014 has also lost its efficacy. Regular List Sr. No. 44
2 CPSW No. 586/2014 c/w SWP No. 192/2014
05. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings do not survive and the same are, accordingly, closed. The contempt petition is disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE Jammu 30.03.2026 Shivalee
Shivalee Khajuria 2026.04.01 17.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu