Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 4725 (MAD)

THIRUPATHI NAIDU v. GANGAIYA NAIDU(DIED)

SA/1116/2014 · 2026-07-17

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA No. 1117 of 2014 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL SA Nos. 1116 and 1117 of 2014 Thirupathi Naidu S/o Varadaiya Naidu, Residing at Mordhana Village Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District ..Appellant in both the appeals Vs 1. Gangaiya Naidu(died) 2. Gajalakshmi W/o Dhakhnamoorthi d/o Thirupathi Naidu, residing at Erukkampattu Village And Post, Gudiyatham Taluk 3. Jothi W/o Gangaiya Naidu 4. Haribabu S/o Gangaiya Naidu 5. Seetharaman S/o Gangaiya Naidu 6. Dhanasekaran S/o Gangaiya Naidu R3 to 6 are residing at Mordhana Village, Gudiyatham Taluk ..Respondents in both the appeals https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1117 of 2014 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer in both the Appeals : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decrees dated 24.02.2014 passed in A.S.Nos.73 and 74 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District confirming the Judgment and Decrees dated 11.08.2011 passed in O.S.Nos.571 and 594 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): R1 - Died R2 – Served - no appearance Mrs.V.Srimathi for R3 To R6 Common Judgment Since the parties and the issues involved in these appeals are one and the same, they are taken up together and a common Judgment is being passed. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 6 is present. 3. On going through the entire documents placed on record it is seen that already several opportunities were given for the appearance of the appellant, however, there is no representation for the appellant. Thereafter, the case was ordered to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1117 of 2014 __________ Page3 of 4 17.07.2026. Today, viz., 17.07.2026 also, none appeared for the appellant, hence the present Second Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd To 1. The Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District 2. The District Munsif, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1117 of 2014 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL J. ssd SA Nos. 1116 and 1117 of 2014 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis