Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 4703 (MAD)

MRS.AGNES MARY (Deceased) and 12 Others v. MRS.K.VICTORIARANI (Deceased)

OP/840/2014 · 2026-06-11

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OP No. 840 of 2014 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE OP No. 840 of 2014 1. Agnes Mary (Deceased) W/o. Late R.Ethiraj 2. E.Alexander S/o.Agnes Mary (Deceased) 3. E.Johnson S/o.Agnes Mary (Deceased) 4. E.Xavier S/o.Agnes Mary (Deceased) 5. Mary Elizabeth D/o.Agnes Mary (Deceased) 6. Mary Josephine W/o.E.Parthikumar (Deceased) 7. Mary Agnes Parthi D/o.E.Parthikumar (Deceased) 8. Nobeli Veroniga D/o.E.Parthikumar, (Deceased) 9. Pudi Parthi Nishanth Novval Asudas S/o.E.Parthikumar (Deceased) 10.Melvin Sagayaraj S/o.E.D'Cruz (Deceased) 11.D.George S/o.E.D'Cruz (Deceased) 12.D.Jancy D/o.E.D'Cruz (Deceased) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OP No. 840 of 2014 __________ Page2 of 4 13.Sagayarani D/o.Mrs.Karmale (P2 to P13 brought on record as Legal heirs of deceased petitioner and amendment carried out as per order dated 09.09.2022 in A.No.3407/2022) .. Petitioners Vs 1. K.Victoriarani (Deceased) W/o.S.Kuppan 2. K.Priyadarshini D/o. S.Kuppan (The 1st respondent died. The 2nd respondent is one of the legal heir of the deceased 1st respondent, amendment carried out vide Memo dt.22.11.2022 and as per order dated 22.11.2022 in OP.No.840 of 2014) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 r/w. Order XXV, Rule 6 of the Original Side Rules, praying that a Succession Certificate may be granted to the Petitioner with power to collect the debts and to receive the interest and dividends on and negotiate, transfer the securities specified in the schedule hereto. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.B.Sumana For R2 Mr.M.Vijay Anand For R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OP No. 840 of 2014 __________ Page3 of 4 ORDER When the matter was listed for hearing on 24.04.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 03.06.2026. Since the matter was not listed on 03.06.2026, Registry was directed to list the matter today i.e., 11.06.2026. When the matter was called today there was no representation for the petitioner and hence it is clear and evident that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the Original Petition. 2. Hence, this Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OP No. 840 of 2014 __________ Page4 of 4 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. SRM OP No. 840 of 2014 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis