A No. 7094 of 2014 __________ Page1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A No. 7094 of 2014 in C.S.No.115 of 2014 Messrs Kian Ann Engineering P.Ltd Formerly Known As Kian Ann Engineering Ltd No.7, Changi South Lane, Singapore Rep.By Group Financial Controller Mr.Tan Wee Kok ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. M/s. Vaishnovi Infrastructure Engineering Private Ltd Gst Road, Nh-45 And Rep.By Herein Managing Director M/s. Vaishnovi Infrastructure Engineering P.Ltd Chennai 04 2. Mr.Raghav Reddy No.3/429, Sundeep Road, Neelankarai, Chennai 41 3. Mr.Ashok Giri No.30, Mgr Salai, Palavakkam, Chennai Besant Nagar, Chennai 90 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To permit the Petitioner/Plaintiff to file the reply statement for written statement filed by the 2nd defendant. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 7094 of 2014 __________ Page2 of 2 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA For Applicant(s): Mr.S.Aravindhan for M/s. Fox Mandal And Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.N.L.Rajah, Senior Advocate for M/s.S.Jayasankar for D2 / R2 ORDER The plaintiff has applied for leave to file a reply to the written statement of the second defendant. In the affidavit in support of the application, it is stated that various incorrect statements were made in the written statement of the second defendant. In particular, it is stated that it was falsely stated that the personal guarantee was not provided by the second defendant and it was retained by the first defendant company. 2. Considering the reasons set out in the affidavit and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown for filing a reply to the written statement, this application is allowed as prayed for. Consequently, the Registry is directed to receive the reply statement of the plaintiff in response to the written statement of the second defendant. 20-04-2026 (2/3) RNA A No. 7094 of 2014 in C.S.No.115 of 2014 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis