Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 3866 (ALL)

SABJI AADHTI ASSOCIATION THRU SECY. ANIL KUMAR GOEL AND ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/61147/2014 · 2026-05-11

Neeraj Tiwari, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 61147 of 2014 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead necessary party in the array of parties, during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Gaurang Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 6. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed his representation dated 27.1.2026 before respondent No.6 and direction may be issued to decide the same. 4. Sri Gaurang Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 6 has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.6 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 27.1.2026 within maximum period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The petitioners are directed to file typed copy of representation dated 27.1.2026 alongwith certified copy of this order. May 12, 2026 P.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.R. Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., M.C.Chaturvedi, Satish Mandhyan (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Sabji Aadhti Association Thru Secy. Anil Kumar Goel And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad