HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32453 of 2014 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. As per office report dated 09.12.2025, the notice has been served upon the petitioner, but neither any vakalatnama nor anyone has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, service of notice upon petitioner is deemed sufficient. It appears that by the efflux of time, the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. March 18, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjit Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I./2014/9889, C.S.C., Nripendra Mishra (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S Kanodia Cements Ltd. Thru Director .....Petitioner(s) U.P.P.C.L. Thru Its Chairman And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad