Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 3849 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P.AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/20159/2014 · 2026-03-17

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20159 of 2014 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of petitioners to press this petition. However, Sri M.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. March 18, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K.R.Sirohi, Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohboob Ahmad (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Vinod Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad