Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 3842 (ALL)

ANAND SHANKAR PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/12281/2014 · 2026-03-22

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

Public Interest Litigationbody2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 12281 of 2014 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. It appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. March 23, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Swapnil Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Anand Shankar Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad