$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2592/2014, I.A. 16340/2025 & I.A. 16374/2025 SUSHMA JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: None. versus VINAY KUMAR JAIN & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. P.K. Rawal and Mr. Vasu U. Purohit, Advs. for D-1(a) & 4. Mr. I.S. Kohli, Adv. for D-3. Mr. Shreshth Jain and Ms. Neha Buttan, Advs. for D-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 19.05.2026 1. On the last date i.e. 04.02.2026, an adjournment was sought by the plaintiff on the ground that the arguing counsel is not available due to indisposition of his wife. In the said order itself, it was made clear that no adjournment will be granted to the plaintiff on the next date. 2. Today, none appears on behalf of the plaintiff when the matter is called out. 3. In view of the above, the suit, along with pending applications, is dismissed in default. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MAY 19, 2026 aj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:40:54