Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2014 DAILYLAW 3403 (DEL)

SURINDER KUMAR BEHL v. STATE THROUGH CBI

CRL.A./334/2014 · 2026-04-10

Vimal Kumar Yadav

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 320/2014 ANIL KUMAR .....Appellant Through: None. versus CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPP, CBI with Mr. Changez Khan, Adv. 5 + CRL.A. 334/2014 SURINDER KUMAR BEHL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dilip Pandita, Adv. versus STATE THROUGH CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPP, CBI with Mr. Changez Khan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R % 10.04.2026 CRL.A. 320/2014 1. Hybrid Mode. 2. None for the Appellant. 3. The death of the Appellant has been verified and reported by the CBI. 4. In view of the death of the Appellant, the appeal stands abated inasmuch as his legal heirs do not seemingly want to continue with the proceedings. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:32:15 CRL.A. 334/2014 5. The factum of death of the Appellant has been verified and reported by the CBI, which is part of record. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant states that the legal heirs of the Appellant are not interested to pursue with the appeal any more. 7. In view of the death of the Appellant, the appeal stands abated. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J APRIL 10, 2026/akc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:32:15