950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014 IN WP/6332/2012 Banabai Bajrang Rajput Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Kale Ajeet B. for the Petitioner - Absent • Ms. U. S. Bhosale, A.G.P. for State • Adv. Chillarge Subhash S. for Respondent No. 5 - Absent __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None for the petitioner. 2) The direction in this matter was to decide the applications of the petitioner dated 21.11.2011 and 02.12.2011 for claiming rental compensation and, if the petitioner is held entitled to the same, to pay the amount to her. 3) The learned A.G.P., by pointing out the affidavit- in-reply, submits that the aforesaid applications of the petitioner have already been decided and an amount of Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:42159-DB 950 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014 Rs.2,34,828/- towards rental compensation has already been paid to her. 4) The cheque for the aforesaid amount as well as the receipt thereof are already placed on record. 5) Under such circumstances, the direction appears to have been complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2