62-CP-268-2014.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2014 Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another ...Petitioners. Versus The Panchgani Hill Station Municipal Corporation Council and Others ...Respondents. WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 39 OF 2003 Mahabaleshwar Giristhan Municipal Council ...Petitioner. In the Matter in Between : Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. WITH REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 10127 OF 2012 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 39 OF 2003 Table Land Vyapari Association Pachgani ...Petitioner. In the Matter in Between : Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. —————— Ms. Urvi Gupte (Through VC), for the PIL Petitioners. Ms. Neha G. Deshpande with Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for the Review Petitioners. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP, for the Respondents-State. —————— Gaikwad RD 1 of 2 62-CP-268-2014.doc Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 09, 2026. P. C. : 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners does not press the contempt petition. 2. The Contempt Petition is disposed of as not pressed. 3. The Review Petitions do not survive and stand disposed of. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 2 of 2 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.09.10 12:49:22 +0530