Writ Petition No.10318/2014 :: 1 :: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10318 OF 2014 Ramakant s/o Hariba Ugile, Died through L.Rs. Jayshree w/o Ramakant Ugile & ors. … PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra … RESPONDENT ....... Mr. S.S. Halkude, Advocate for petitioners Mr. V.M. Chate, A.G.P. for respondent – State ....… CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The petitioners assail the order dated 25/6/2014, rendered by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur, District Latur, below Exh.1 in Misc. Application No.30/2014 in Special Darkhast No.59/2010 in Land Acquisition Reference No.736/2006. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the land of the petitioners has been acquired for the purpose of construction of percolation tank for village Ugliwadi, Taluka Ahmedpur, District Latur. In 2026:BHC-AUG:39594 Writ Petition No.10318/2014 :: 2 :: relation to the same, a Reference was presented by the petitioners for enhancement of compensation. Same was partly allowed. 3. Raising exception to the same, the original claimants i.e. petitioners vis-a-vis the State authorities preferred First Appeals before this Court against the judgment and decree passed in Reference, wherein this Court granted stay to the execution of decree with a condition that the State shall deposit the entire amount of compensation awarded. 4. In the interregnum, the petitioners presented an application before the concerned Court, requesting withdrawal of the amount deposited by the State authorities. While acceding the request for withdrawal, the Court directed to furnish Bank guarantee. Accordingly, the same was furnished. 5. It is thereafter, the petitioners presented an application seeking release of the Bank guarantee and to withdraw the amount from the Bank towards the said guarantee. The concerned Court rejected the said request. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court. 6. It appears that, in the interregnum, by order dated9/12/2025, the First Appeal No.379/2012 presented by the State vis-a-vis the original claimants have been disposed of by this Court in view of Government Writ Petition No.10318/2014 :: 3 :: Resolution dated 3/11/2016. 7. Thus, in view of disposal of the First Appeal No.379/2012, the entitlement of the petitioner to the enhanced amount has been endorsed by this Court pursuant to the order of dismissal of the appeal presented by the State. As such, the application presented by the petitioner below Exh.1 in Misc. Application No.30/2014 in Special Darkhast No.59/2010 in Land Acquisition Reference No.736/2006 deserves to be allowed. 8. In the result, Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Resultantly, The application Exh.1 in Misc. Application No.30/2014 in Special Darkhast No.59/2010 in Land Acquisition Reference No.736/2006 is hereby allowed. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) fmp/-