SHESHRAO MANIKRAO PATIL AND ANOTHER v. BHIMRAO SANGRAM GAROLE
WP/8556/2014 · 2026-09-02
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2790 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2790 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 58-WP-8556-14.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8556 OF 2014 SHESHRAO MANIKRAO PATIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS BHIMRAO SANGRAM GAROLE ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Pushkar S. Shendurnikar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. R. Shaikh h/f. Mr. Anandsing Bayas ...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 02-09-2026 PER COURT:-
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous following the abatement of the suit. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, this will not preclude to make a fresh request as and when the cause of action arises.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE rrd 2026:BHC-AUG:40049