943-FA-961-2014.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 943 FIRST APPEAL NO. 961 OF 2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Shivaji Mukataji Bhondave WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Balbhim Maruti Mate WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 965 OF 2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Tukaram Maruti Mate L.rs. Kamalabai Tukaram Mate WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11322 OF 2010 IN FA/961/2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Shivaji Mukataji Bhondave WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11324 OF 2010 IN FA/965/2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Tukaram Maruti Mate L.rs. Kamalabai Tukaram Mate WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11320 OF 2010 IN FA/962/2014 The State Of Mah And Ors VERSUS Balbhim Maruti Mate Shubham 2026:BHC-AUG:25551 943-FA-961-2014.doc ... Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Appellant/State. Mr. M. P. Tripathi for the Respondents. …. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 25 JUNE 2026 P. C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties in all these Appeals. 2. By these Appeals, the Appellants are assailing the orders dated 13th March 2009 passed by learned Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga in LAR Nos.722 of 2005, 693 of 2005 and 711 of 2005 whereby enhanced compensation came to be granted to the Claimants. 3. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3rd November 2016 with Corrigendum dated 23rd February 2017 and 13th August 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 4. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene in these Appeals. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 5. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, the captioned Civil Applications filed therein do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Shubham