PIMPALESHWAR MANDIR DEOSTAN TRUST, THROUGH TRUSTEE v. SHRI. MATHEW ANTHONY FERNANDIS AND ORS
WP/7307/2014 · 2026-06-22
Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2682 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2682 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
15_WP7307_14.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7307 OF 2014 Pimpaleshwar Mandir Deostan Trust through Trustees … Petitioners Vs. Mathew Anthony Fernandis and others … Respondents Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar a/w. Mr. H. S. Pawaskar and Mr. Rohan Patil for Petitioners. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for Respondents - State. Ms. Shyamali Gadre a/w. Ms. Mrunal Tavade i/b. Little & Co. for Respondent No.4 - MIDC.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 22, 2026 P.C. : . In this petition, respondent No.6 - State has filed its reply affidavit making the following categorical statement:-
“3. Respondent No.6 has directed me to bring it to the kind notice of this Hon. Court that in the light of order dated 21/04/2017 passed by this Hon. Court in the present Writ Petition, it is respectfully submitted that considering Hon. Supreme Court’s order dated 06/03/2020 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.9036-9038/2016, Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and others regarding Section 24 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Distribution of Compensation after the Award and Transfer of possession of acquired land to Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Respondent No.6 is taking back its letter dated 16/04/2014. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit-2 is the copy of the said letter dated 16/04/2014.”
2. In view of the above, as the respondent - State itself is recalling letter dated 16.04.2024, the learned counsel for the petitioner Trust submits that nothing survives in this petition as the relief prayed for has 1/2 PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date: 2026.06.22 18:05:01 +0530
15_WP7307_14.doc been effectively granted to the petitioner by the said stand taken by the respondent - State.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 2/2 Minal Parab