M/S. SIDDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS v. M/S. R.K.CONSTRO PROJECTS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS
ARBA/8/2014 · 2026-03-24
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1007.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1007 ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2014 M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises And Others VERSUS M/s. R.k.constro Projects Pvt. Ltd. And Others *** CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J DATE : MARCH 24, 2026 PC :
1. This Court noticed that on March 13, 2024 the learned Counsel for the Appellants submits that he has no instructions in the matter. Thereafter, Court issued notice to Appellants, returnable on
10.04.2024. As per the bailiffs report, Court service notice to Appellant No. 1 returned unserved as Appellant No. 1 i.e. M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises has not found on given address and said building has been abolished. Even Court service notice of Appellant Nos. 2 to 4 are returned unserved as ‘incomplete address’ is provided.
2. Since the Appellants are not giving instructions to their Counsel and even not causing appearance, present Arbitration Appeals as well as Civil Applications are dismissed for non prosecution.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) usm PAGE 1 OF 1 2026:BHC-AUG:12447